The Illusion of Absolute Knowledge in Cultural Studies

Abstract

The present study contends that humanities and cultural studies research reflect the opinions and views of the researchers rather than providing conclusive information regarding social interactions and cultural surroundings. Because knowledge is influenced by context and perspective, it is crucial to critically examine our own position, acknowledge biases, and reevaluate methodologies. Failing to do so would perpetuate the fallacy of absolute knowledge ingrained in scholarly tradition. In addition to challenging this fallacy, a relational theory of knowledge allows for a fresh perspective on issues of substitution and objectification. Is it always the case that those being studied view their researchers as autonomous and authoritative?  While it may seem unlikely that this relational gap can be easily bridged, this study identifies it as a point of tension. The presentation and organization of information in academic inquiry are subjects of debate. There have been allegations against the humanities and cultural studies for presenting partial findings. The formulation of research inquiries is shaped by the researcher's intentions. Cultural studies stresses the importance of both the queries and the responses. This underscores that interpretation, rather than objective truth, is our main focus. We are not just purveyors of information; our creation of knowledge is affected by preconceived notions.